

|
|
|
Comparing
Sample Means
Lecture Goals
You should: - be able to test hypotheses for related & independent means - understand the advantages
of using different designs for comparing means
Chapter 14
Comparing
2 Means
- Which teaching technique is better? - Do men and women's attitudes differ? - Are people better after treatment? - Do people work better after training? - Do people's brains grow with age?
Related Samples - Is same person better after treatment - Is same person better after training
Independent Samples - Which drug helps more A or B? - Who scored higher group A or B?
Related Samples - Usually within subjects manipulations - Between subjects manipulations on matched
samples
Independent Samples - Between subjects manipulations
Does our new the diet plan work?
How to answer with Related Samples: Repeated Measures Design = measure same people before
and after
Matched Subjects Design = simulated repeated measures deign = have a 2 groups & match subjects on characteristics (age, gender, SES) Person
Before After
A
255 251
Weight Weight A
255 - 251
= 4
Observed Difference = D Expected Difference if Ho = 0
t = Observed Value - Expected Value = D - 0 Estimated Standard Deviation Estimated S. D. Estimated S.D. = standard error of the difference
scores
t = Observed Value - Expected Value = D - 0 Estimated Standard Deviation sD-bars
Before: smeans = s/ n
see formula
sD-bars = sDif. scores / n
See t-formula
What do we need?
See symbols
Weight Weight A
255 - 251
= 4
D = 54/8 = 6.75 Person Before After Diff. Diff.2 A
255 251
4 16
D = 6.75 S Di = 54 S Di 2 = 502 N = 8
Alternative
7 Step Process for Testing
2 Related Means
State alternative hypothesis Set level of significance Determine critical t-score & region Calculate the t-score Compare to make decision about Ho Draw a conclusion
Person
Before After
A
255 251
Step 1: State the Null Hypothesis a = .05
Step 5: Calculate t-score
see t-formula worked out
Step 6: Decision About Ho
t
= 2.749 = in critical region
see graph
Step 6: Decision About Ho
Here: 2.749 > 1.895 so Reject
Ho
How to answer with Independent Samples: Experimental-Control Group Design = compare people who get manipulation to those who don't = can compare more than one experimental group = measure all at same time
Person
Weight Person
Weight
Comparing 2 Independent Means Now we are comparing group means, NOT the change in each subject or across matched subjects Now - interested in the difference between the means of each group Observed Difference = X1 - X2 Expected Difference if Ho = 0
Estimated Standard Deviation Estimated S. D.
Estimated Standard Deviation smean1 - mean2
Now idea = weighted average of sample variances
Formula for estimated standard error See formula t = Observed Value - Expected Value = (X1 - X2) - 0 Estimated Standard Deviation smean1 - mean2 See formula
X1 = ? SS1 = ?
X2 = ? SS1 = ? N1 = ? S
Xi = ?
N2 = ? S
X2 = ?
S X12
= ?
S X22 = ?
S Xi = 1606 S X2 = 1550
No Plan Group Diet Plan Group Weight Weight2 Weight Weight2 255
65025 251
63001
SXi2 = 330446 S X22 = 308618
X1 = 1606/8 = 200.75 S Xi = 1606
X2 = 1550/8 = 193.75 S X2 = 1550 N1 = 8
= 330446
- (1606)2
SS2 = S
X22 - (S
X2)2
= 308618
- (1550)2
see t-formula worked out
Ho = both samples from same pop....so
3) Homogeneity of variance (s1 = s 2) Within s vs.
Between s Designs
Advantages Compare people to themselves No individual diffs. across groups - this can reduce variance and increase p(reject Ho) Order effects Fatigue effects
Motivation effects
Between Subjects Design Eliminates _____ across conditions Order effects Fatigue effects Motivation effects Compares people to other people Need random selection and assignment to reduce individual
differences across grps. -
Chapter 14
Problems 9, 10, 12, 13, 16a only, 20
|