Yournotes sponsored in part by

Study Break!


Art History 112
 

Thursday, February 18, 1999

Announcements:

  • homework: reading assignment; see T.A.
Lecture notes:     The green text refers to slides displayed during recitation.
  • there was an actual debate between supporters of Rubens' and Poussin's styles
    • controversy began after both of their deaths
    • late 17th Century
    • members of the French Academy split into two factions
  • the main argument: challenged Renaissance ideals that art was rational, calm; that is should be appreciated by the educated
  • the Academy had three acceptable styles
    • classical (Greek/Roman)
    • Raphael (Renaissance)
    • Poussin (ordered, rational)
  • Rubens, on the other hand, was influenced by Titian for whom color and glazes were very important
  • drawing vs. color: lack of distinct lines (drawing) implies movement
    • figures do not actually have outlines around them
    Poussin
  • subject matter should be great, important
  • detail should no intrude
  • bold emphasis on subject matter
  • should appeal to intellect
  • not natural, but theoretical interpretation
  • drawing or use of line is most important
    Rubens
  • color dominated drawing
  • purpose of painting is to deceive the eye--color achieves this
  • drawing represents only part of the truth
  • color represents truth
  • color appeals to everyone (need not be educated, intellectual elite); "art for everybody"
  • supporters believed that the Academy's blind devotion to the ancients resulted in soulless artists
 
 
Information contained on this page does not represent the lecture verbatim.
These notes are not a substitute for class attendance.



This page last updated: [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Copyright 1998.
Questions?  Email: info@yournotes.com