|
Art History 112
Thursday, February 18, 1999
Announcements:
-
homework: reading assignment; see T.A.
Lecture notes: The
green text refers to slides displayed during recitation.
-
there was an actual debate between supporters of Rubens' and Poussin's
styles
-
controversy began after both of their deaths
-
late 17th Century
-
members of the French Academy split into two factions
-
the main argument: challenged Renaissance ideals that art was rational,
calm; that is should be appreciated by the educated
-
the Academy had three acceptable styles
-
classical (Greek/Roman)
-
Raphael (Renaissance)
-
Poussin (ordered, rational)
-
Rubens, on the other hand, was influenced by Titian for whom color and
glazes were very important
-
drawing vs. color: lack of distinct lines (drawing) implies movement
-
figures do not actually have outlines around them
Poussin
-
subject matter should be great, important
-
detail should no intrude
-
bold emphasis on subject matter
-
should appeal to intellect
-
not natural, but theoretical interpretation
-
drawing or use of line is most important
Rubens
-
color dominated drawing
-
purpose of painting is to deceive the eye--color achieves this
-
drawing represents only part of the truth
-
color represents truth
-
color appeals to everyone (need not be educated, intellectual elite);
"art for everybody"
-
supporters believed that the Academy's blind devotion to the ancients resulted
in soulless artists
|